<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rack and Pinion Motion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gabijack.com/2009/05/rack-and-pinion-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gabijack.com/2009/05/rack-and-pinion-motion/</link>
	<description>Gabi&#039;s Blog on solid modeling, design and engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1390</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mhead10</title>
		<link>http://gabijack.com/2009/05/rack-and-pinion-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>mhead10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabijack.com/?p=1464#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Greetings,
Your comment, &quot;Granted, you can’t really use the models of gears generated this way for manufacturing purposes, but they are at the very least a decent representation for when you need to simulate movement&quot; is not quite obvious to me.  I would think the configured settings could be sent to a precision gear machinist or one could pick settings which would be a &quot;standard&quot; gear configuration, thus one could use these models for manufacturing purposes.  Am I way off here?  Does Solidworks let you pick standard settings and not display accurate results?

Thanks ahead of time for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,<br />
Your comment, &#8220;Granted, you can’t really use the models of gears generated this way for manufacturing purposes, but they are at the very least a decent representation for when you need to simulate movement&#8221; is not quite obvious to me.  I would think the configured settings could be sent to a precision gear machinist or one could pick settings which would be a &#8220;standard&#8221; gear configuration, thus one could use these models for manufacturing purposes.  Am I way off here?  Does Solidworks let you pick standard settings and not display accurate results?</p>
<p>Thanks ahead of time for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GabiJack</title>
		<link>http://gabijack.com/2009/05/rack-and-pinion-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>GabiJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabijack.com/?p=1464#comment-555</guid>
		<description>I found it in a folder named Gears, which is inside another one named Power Transmission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it in a folder named Gears, which is inside another one named Power Transmission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://gabijack.com/2009/05/rack-and-pinion-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabijack.com/?p=1464#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Great tutorial.

I just had two questions:

1. Where in the toolbox did you find the rack and pinion. I am running SW2009 premium and was unable to find it.

2. Is there a way to constrain the rack so that only the pinion moves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tutorial.</p>
<p>I just had two questions:</p>
<p>1. Where in the toolbox did you find the rack and pinion. I am running SW2009 premium and was unable to find it.</p>
<p>2. Is there a way to constrain the rack so that only the pinion moves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeckos150</title>
		<link>http://gabijack.com/2009/05/rack-and-pinion-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeckos150</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabijack.com/?p=1464#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Hello

Nice tutorial. Didn&#039;t know about tool-box.

I have a question though : I&#039;m trying to make a rack/pinion mate where the pinion stays still (no rotation, no translation of any kind) and the rack is rolling on it. It seems not to work properly. The rack is not moving as it should, despite the fact I properly defined the mechanical constraints. Tangency is OK but the rolling is completly out of normal.

Did I make a mistake? Is there a specific way to define this kind of movement?

Thanks!

Bye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>Nice tutorial. Didn&#8217;t know about tool-box.</p>
<p>I have a question though : I&#8217;m trying to make a rack/pinion mate where the pinion stays still (no rotation, no translation of any kind) and the rack is rolling on it. It seems not to work properly. The rack is not moving as it should, despite the fact I properly defined the mechanical constraints. Tangency is OK but the rolling is completly out of normal.</p>
<p>Did I make a mistake? Is there a specific way to define this kind of movement?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Bye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rack and Pinion Motion, by Gabi Jack</title>
		<link>http://gabijack.com/2009/05/rack-and-pinion-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Rack and Pinion Motion, by Gabi Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabijack.com/?p=1464#comment-552</guid>
		<description>[...] Keep Reading: GabiJack.com » Blog Archive » Rack and Pinion Motion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keep Reading: GabiJack.com » Blog Archive » Rack and Pinion Motion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
