Logo Background RSS

Interesting Survey

  • Just a few minutes ago, I followed a link to an interesting survey about SolidWorks packaging and pricing. I’m not sure how long this survey has been going on, to be honest, so I apologize if you have already seen it or heard about it before, but it was news for me. I had included a link to it, but they told me that was my personal link and I’ve already taken the survey. You can access this survey from the Customer Portal or through the task pane, in the SolidWorks Resources tab,  you’ll find a link among the news under Community.

    Basically, the survey makes you choose among different combos of functionality for the three different seats currently available in SolidWorks: standard, professional and premium. First they show you descriptions of three options for each seat, including the “as is” option, and two others that include some extra functionality and/or take away some other goodies, like photo-realistic rendering in professional and premium, or Simulation capabilities. There’s also a description of a stand-alone solution for photo-realistic rendering and presentation, and some stand-alone solutions for simulation, that I guess you could buy separately or together with your seat of SolidWorks, if you choose.   A brief description of similar products offered by AutoDesk follows.

    Next, they ask you to choose from a list of possible choices which one you would prefer the most and which one the least. The choices include options such as SolidWorks Professional #1 with photo realistic rendering option (the standalone) for “X” amount of money or AutoDesk Inventor Suite for “Y” amount of money, for instance.  This part is a little tricky, though, but at least you have the cheat sheet available to check again what was supposed to be offered with each option.  However, unless you are very familiar with AutoDesk products, you can’t be really sure from their super-brief description of what functionality is exactly offered and how the price would compare.  Also, I’m not sure these prices included maintenance fees. I don’t think they did. Some of them seemed a bit too expensive to me, considering all that had been taken off the original license.

    Part of me really hopes this means there will be a more affordable way to purchase a license of SolidWorks in the not so distant future, although there’s also the other part of me, the realistic one, that thinks it’s better not to hold my breath on this one.  It would be cool, though. I can think of a few bells and whistles I could certainly do without, but only as long as it really helps the price go down substantially. If you are going to end up paying almost the same as for the “as is” version, then it’s not worth it. What would be really cool is if you could buy some basic, affordable seat and then grow it by modules as you need, instead of having to upgrade to something twice as expensive and full of functionality you may never really use. While I’m in dreamland, it would be nice if they lowered the maintenance fees too.  Well, dreaming is cheap, right? Waking up to reality, now that’s the hard part. J

  1. #1 adrian says:
    December 8, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Yo comense el “survey” pero empezo a parecer mas un examen psicsometrico que una enquesta, asi que no lo termine. Esta mal estructurado y dudo que muchos usuarios lo concluyan.

    Reply
    • Hola Adrian,

      Me hiciste reir con eso del examen psicometrico. Se a lo que te refieres. Me dio la impresion que algunas preguntas se repetian, pero los precios cambiaban, como para agarrarnos en curva. Igualito que el examen psicometrico! He buscado por todas partes pero en ningun lugar anuncian o dan aunque sea una pista de lo que pretenden con esta escuesta. Yo ya me habia ilusionado que igual y le bajaban el precio al SolidWorks. ;-)

      Reply
  2. Gabi,
    I just took the survey. Actually, I tried to take the survey. After answering the first four or five questions, I was informed that I didn’t meet the criteria for the individuals they were looking to survey. The question is, who are they actually wanting to survey, and what are they actually trying to ascertain?

    Reply
    • Hi Jeff,

      Interesting! When I took the survey, they didn’t even ask for my name or email address… But the very first questions may be the secret to their selection criteria. From my answers to those questions, they learned that I’m an individual or really small business (1-3 employees), an engineer or designer, looking to buy a license and use it for consultancy, and that I make the decision over what to buy and when. How were your answers different to that?

      Reply
  3. Gabi – The survey says you need a valid code to participate (and yours has already been used). Where’d you get the link from? Did you have to sign up or something first?
    -Mark

    Reply
    • Hi Mark,

      Sorry about that and thanks for letting me know! I found the link on the task pane among the community news when I opened SolidWorks. You can also find it at the customer portal.

      Reply
Leave a Comment